Treat a confirmed zone
Choose a targeted method and issue preparation, placement and re-entry instructions for the affected area.
The useful next step may be treatment, monitoring or additional access. We explain which decision the evidence supports and what must happen before review.

Immediate treatment is appropriate only when identification, extent, access and safety are sufficiently clear.
Choose a targeted method and issue preparation, placement and re-entry instructions for the affected area.
Establish whether activity continues, which edge is used or which insect is present before applying control.
Ask an authorised person to open a relevant shared void, service space, store or adjoining area.
Record what new evidence would justify reassessment where signs appear historic or inconclusive.
A report of droppings should state their position and freshness, any associated gnawing or tracks, and the openings that could support movement. An insect report should preserve a specimen where safe and compare it with harbourage, lifecycle signs and the material being damaged. Bites, noises and smells are prompts to inspect, not species identification.
The treatment brief then sets boundaries. It records the rooms included, areas not accessed, occupants or pets affecting method choice and anything that must remain operational. Where food handling, stock or shared fabric matters, the responsible person receives a separate action rather than an implied instruction.
This record makes follow-up useful. Fresh evidence can be compared with an agreed baseline, while completed cleaning or repair work is separated from the effect of treatment.
A useful recommendation answers “why now?”. Proofing, wider access or another visit should be linked to a demonstrated route, a monitor result or a remaining lifecycle stage, not added as generic aftercare.
The visible symptom may lead to a different service once the source is identified.
Movement, food and small service openings mapped before controls and proofing.
View service ↗02Live evidence, room boundaries and preparation agreed before treatment.
View service ↗03Warmth, moisture, food and monitoring used to define the active area.
View service ↗04Breeding material and entry addressed rather than adult numbers alone.
View service ↗Fix the date, room, sign and relevant change without naming a pest prematurely.
Compare identification, harbourage, entry and extent across accessible areas.
Apply control, monitoring or an access request with clear preparation and ownership.
Use fresh evidence to continue, adapt, proof or close the programme.
Clear decisions prevent unnecessary preparation and repeated treatment.
A photograph can help with initial triage, especially when it shows a specimen with scale, but it rarely establishes extent, harbourage or access. The final scope depends on the evidence and conditions at the property.
Record the latest sign and make the immediate area accessible without moving affected belongings elsewhere. Secure exposed food, note products already used and tell us about children, pets or rooms that cannot be entered.
Monitoring can confirm whether activity is current, identify a route or distinguish one insect from another. It is useful when signs are intermittent or the available evidence does not yet support a safe targeted treatment.
Not automatically. The technician compares fresh signs and monitor results with the original baseline. The next step may be continued control, a different method, wider access, proofing or closure of the case.
Tell us which rooms you control and give the managing agent or landlord contact for relevant common areas. Access should be widened only when findings show why a riser, loft, store or neighbouring zone matters.
Share the affected room, latest sign and access limits so we can define the first useful decision.