Keep numbered monitors where fitted
Do not move them to a more convenient corner. Their stable position is what allows a meaningful reading.
A treatment plan is only useful if its result can be measured. We agree what will be checked, when it will be checked and what each outcome means.

Note the species where known, the location, date and condition of droppings, damage, bites, catches or sightings.
Monitors, treatments and proofing recommendations are positioned against the routes or harbourage found.
The review timing follows the pest, lifecycle and method rather than an arbitrary promise of instant silence.
Fresh evidence supports adaptation; a quiet, stable record may support closure after the agreed observation period.
With mice or rats, technicians distinguish fresh droppings and current movement from historic contamination. A bait take shows feeding at a point, but it does not on its own reveal the entrance. Tracking evidence, gaps around services and activity at boundaries help identify the route that needs attention.
For cockroaches, fixed monitors provide a pattern across warm, damp harbourage. The position and life stage of catches can guide gel placement, cleaning priorities and the scope of the next inspection. Moving or discarding monitors between visits makes that comparison much weaker.
Bed bug work uses a different measure. Live insects, cast skins, spotting and activity in defined resting areas are considered alongside the treatment method and preparation. A mark on skin is not treated as proof of species, and a single early sighting after treatment is interpreted against the planned sequence.
Do not move them to a more convenient corner. Their stable position is what allows a meaningful reading.
Photograph a new finding safely and give its exact room or external location instead of a general address report.
Unplanned sprays, powders or cleaning can repel pests, contaminate controls or remove evidence needed at review.
It is not simply a repeat of the first attendance.
The service is selected after identification and inspection, with the expected follow-up explained before work begins.
Movement records, harbourage checks and route-led exclusion.
View service →02Monitor-led treatment for warm and concealed harbourage.
View service →03Defined room scope, preparation and staged assessment.
View service →04Repairs checked against the route they are intended to close.
View service →Closure considers the pest’s lifecycle, the observation period, fixed-monitor results and whether recommended access or proofing work is complete. An inaccessible area stays recorded as a limitation rather than being silently counted as clear.
Not necessarily. Species, lifecycle, treatment method, timing and whether the sign is fresh all affect interpretation.
A stable position allows like-for-like comparison. Moving a monitor changes what it samples.
The technician may read controls, inspect fresh signs, complete a planned sequence or verify proofing, depending on the agreed purpose.
Closure follows an appropriate observation period, evidence of control and completion or recording of relevant prevention work.
Tell us where and when the evidence appeared, what has already been tried and which areas can be accessed.
Call 020 3404 6650Send the evidence details